NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX 560X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1175 MHz
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1275 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 3553
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 16524
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 5698
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 5698

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 3 April 2018
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1175 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1275 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494 vs 3553
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 16524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 5698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 5698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X

Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 404
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3718
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3718

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	669 vs 404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4873 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4873 vs 3718

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6494

3553

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

404

669

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

16524

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

5698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

4873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

5698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

4873

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3357

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD Radeon RX 560X
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494	3553
PassMark - G2D Mark	404	669
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	16524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	5698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	4873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	5698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	4873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3357

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	AMD Radeon RX 560X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Code name	TU117	Polaris 21
Launch date	27 May 2019	3 April 2018
Place in performance rating	400	397
Type	Mobile Workstation	Desktop, Laptop
Design		Radeon RX 500X Series
GCN generation		4th Gen
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1275 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1175 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	1024
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s	20.40 GP/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	81.60 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	3,000 million
Compute units		14/16
Floating-point performance		2.6 TFLOPs
Render output units		16
Stream Processors		896/1024
Texture Units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		170 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	112 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support