NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1111 vs 935
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1111 vs 935 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 386.3 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 7424 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25045 vs 17445
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160742 vs 79947
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25045 vs 17445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160742 vs 79947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1111 | 935 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17445 | 25045 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79947 | 160742 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD107 | AD104 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 46 |
Launch date | 2023 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 7424 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 386.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 35800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |