NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- 568.6x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1890 MHz
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 vs 8 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1890 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Name | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96332 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 555 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15753 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 101 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 22900 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |