NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and ATI Radeon 9800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 21 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.6x more core clock speed: 2325 MHz vs 412 MHz
- 146151.5x more texture fill rate: 482.3 GTexel/s vs 3.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 150 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective vs 730 MHz
- 8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1286 vs 160
- 506x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28843 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 vs 1 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 2325 MHz vs 412 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s vs 3.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective vs 730 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 vs 160 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 XT
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | ATI Radeon 9800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 | 160 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 | 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 186565 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | ATI Radeon 9800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | GB205 | R360 |
Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 20 | 1080 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 2325 MHz | 412 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s | 3.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 31100 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 245 mm, 9.6 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x Molex |
Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.8 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 23.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 730 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR7 | DDR |