NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 215 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25496 vs 25232
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25496 vs 25232

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	5120 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watt vs 215 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25496 vs 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25496 vs 25232

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 915 MHz
Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1745 MHz
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 578
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18207 vs 14991
Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99388 vs 97305

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1605 MHz vs 915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 1745 MHz
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark	879 vs 578
PassMark - G3D Mark	18207 vs 14991
Geekbench - OpenCL	99388 vs 97305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25496

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25496

25232

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3359

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

578

879

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14991

18207

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

97305

99388

Name	NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25496	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25496	25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	578	879
PassMark - G3D Mark	14991	18207
Geekbench - OpenCL	97305	99388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1438.826
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		7

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA104	TU104
Place in performance rating	133	134
Launch date		2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP)		$499
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1745 MHz	1770 MHz
Core clock speed	915 MHz	1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	558.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	17.87 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	17.87 TFLOPS
Pipelines	5120	2560
Pixel fill rate	139.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	279.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	17400 million	13.6 B
CUDA cores		2560
Maximum GPU temperature		88 C
Render output units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Display Port		1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6 pin + 8 pin
Height		4.556” (115.7mm)
Length		10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		650 Watt
Width		2-Slot
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.1
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready