NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19403 vs 12755
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1000 vs 806
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122777 vs 62661
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 187.131
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 2548.187
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 15.882
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 117.673
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 901.388
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 17812
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 17812
- Around 85% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11086 vs 5987
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 1408 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19403 vs 12755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 vs 806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 vs 62661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 vs 5987 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 140 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19403 | 12755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 | 806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 | 62661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 | 5987 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU116 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 217 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |