NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19428 vs 19278
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1002 vs 858
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 401.574
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3290
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147584 vs 123218
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 4156.52
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 32.297
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 162.131
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1895.111

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19428 19278
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002 858
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123218 147584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	420.465 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4156.52 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.297 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.131 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1895.111 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3290

Compare specifications (specs)