NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1221.4x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27855 vs 10582
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 52.821
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 793.297
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 3.631
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 48.966
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 163.204
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 11 January 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27855 vs 10582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 vs 52.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 vs 793.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 vs 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 vs 48.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 vs 163.204 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27855 | 10582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 | 52.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 | 793.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 | 48.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 | 163.204 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Code name | TU117 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 11 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 756 | 759 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1093 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,870 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T600 with others
NVIDIAT600 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
NVIDIAT600 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
