NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 65520
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 16138
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 16138
  • Around 50% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 10139
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 December 2018 vs 4 November 2017
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz
Pipelines 4608 vs 3840
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 vs 65520
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 16138
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 16138
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 15164 vs 10139

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1405 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138072
65520
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
16138
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
16138
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
15164
10139
Name NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986
PassMark - G2D Mark 827
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 65520
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 16138
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 16138
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 15164 10139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 146.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4303.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 23.759
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 163.551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1382.954

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU102 GP102
Launch date 18 December 2018 4 November 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499 $1,199
Place in performance rating 90 215
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1582 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1405 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 4608 3840
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 280 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 12,150 gflops
Texture fill rate 379.7 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 384 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 11408 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 547.6 GB / s