NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19946 vs 16374
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 88540
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 16640
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19946 vs 16374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 88540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 824
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3707
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3353
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3707
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19946 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 88540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU102 | GP100 |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 94 | 92 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 921.6 GB / s |