NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1304 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1442 MHz
  • Around 29% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3584
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 16374
  • Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 84757
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 16640
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 16640
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 December 2018 vs 1 October 2016
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1304 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1442 MHz
Pipelines 4608 vs 3584
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986 vs 16374
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 vs 84757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 16640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

  • Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 280 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 827
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3707
  • 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3353
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3707
  • 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 235 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 847 vs 827
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13211 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 22133 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13211 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 22133 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19986
16374
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
827
847
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138072
84757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
22133
Name NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986 16374
PassMark - G2D Mark 827 847
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 84757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 22133
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 15164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1056.078

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU102 GP100
Launch date 18 December 2018 1 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499
Place in performance rating 90 88
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1442 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1304 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 4608 3584
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 280 Watt 235 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 15,300 million
Floating-point performance 10,329 gflops
Texture fill rate 322.8 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 384 Bit 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 1430 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 921.6 GB / s