NVIDIA Tegra 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tegra 2 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tegra 2

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date 3 June 2010 vs 20 April 2006
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 90 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 30 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560

  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tegra 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560

Name NVIDIA Tegra 2 NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark 114
PassMark - G2D Mark 360

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tegra 2 NVIDIA Quadro FX 560

Essentials

Architecture GeForce ULP Curie
Code name Tegra 2 G73
Launch date 3 June 2010 20 April 2006
Place in performance rating not rated 472
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $299
Price now $150.25
Value for money (0-100) 0.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 400 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 90 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 30 Watt
Texture fill rate 4.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count 177 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 198 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX N / A 9.0c
OpenGL ES 2.0 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1200 MHz
Memory type GDDR3