NVIDIA Tegra 2 vs Intel Aubrey Isle
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tegra 2 and Intel Aubrey Isle videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tegra 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Aubrey Isle
- 4x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 | Intel Aubrey Isle | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GeForce ULP | Knights |
| Code name | Tegra 2 | Knights Ferry |
| Launch date | 3 June 2010 | 31 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 76.8 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Texture fill rate | 1.2 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | N / A | 11.1 |
| OpenGL | ES 2.0 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
