NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2090 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2090
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 3132 MHz
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 574 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2090 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla C2090 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF110 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1327 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |