NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K10 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 73.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 16
- 114.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 40 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 1 May 2012 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K10 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK104 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 May 2012 | 3 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 981 | 983 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 272 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |