NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20c and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | RS880 |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 980 | 982 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2496 | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |