NVIDIA Tesla K40st vs AMD Radeon R9 270

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40st and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40st

  • 2.4x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
  • Around 81% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate 178.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2880 vs 1280
Floating-point performance 4,291 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270

  • Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 245 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 245 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40st
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270

Name NVIDIA Tesla K40st AMD Radeon R9 270
PassMark - G3D Mark 4306
PassMark - G2D Mark 567
Geekbench - OpenCL 74175
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1282.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 93.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 261.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3347
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1603

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K40st AMD Radeon R9 270

Essentials

Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK110B Curacao
Launch date 22 November 2013 13 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $7,699 $179
Place in performance rating not rated 520
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,291 gflops 2,368 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2880 1280
Texture fill rate 178.8 GTexel / s 74 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 245 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 2,800 million
Boost clock speed 925 MHz
Stream Processors 1280

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 210 mm
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.4 GB / s 179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA Tesla K40st with others

NVIDIA Tesla K40st NVIDIA
Tesla K40st
vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition NVIDIA
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIA Tesla K40st NVIDIA
Tesla K40st
vs AMD Radeon R9 270 AMD
Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Tesla K40st NVIDIA
Tesla K40st
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 760 X2