NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 10.1x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 768
• 4.7x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3046 vs 2978
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.191 vs 35.15
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 180.026 vs 163.258
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5204 vs 4397
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5204 vs 4397

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 385
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11703 vs 10282
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 814.192
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 50.918
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3306
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3306

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3046 2978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	385 530
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10282 11703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.191 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	814.192 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.918 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	180.026 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5204 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3693 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5204 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3693 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 3356

Compare specifications (specs)