NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 38.3x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.81 GTexel / s
- 80x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 32
- 56.9x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- 18x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2994 vs 166
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 395 vs 51
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.918 vs 38.948
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 vs 1731
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 vs 1731
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 11.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 640 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops vs 117.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2994 vs 166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 vs 51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 vs 38.948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 vs 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 46.191
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 814.192
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 180.026
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 vs 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 vs 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 vs 180.026 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2994 | 166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 51 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10282 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 179.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 1813.265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 38.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 757.451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 1731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M10 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
Code name | GM107 | G96C |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 640 | 637 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 738 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | 117.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 640 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 11.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 16.13 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |