NVIDIA Tesla M2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 96
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 408 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF100 | GT215 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 1321 | 1322 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 1249 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |