NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla M60

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 557 MHz vs 550 MHz
977.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
512x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 8
431.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
64x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 256 MB
4.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
81.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 vs 93
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 334

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2015 vs 15 August 2008
Core clock speed	557 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2048 vs 8
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2x 8 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7551 vs 93
PassMark - G2D Mark	513 vs 334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

15x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 300 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7551

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

513

334

Name	NVIDIA Tesla M60	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7551	93
PassMark - G2D Mark	513	334
Geekbench - OpenCL	29295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	114.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1451.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	70.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	314.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1791

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla M60	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GM204	G98
Launch date	30 August 2015	15 August 2008
Place in performance rating	488	485
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz
Core clock speed	557 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops	22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	2x 2048	8
Texture fill rate	2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec	2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	2x 160.4 GB / s	9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory		0