NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 557 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 977.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
  • 512x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 8
  • 431.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 256 MB
  • 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 81.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7551 vs 93
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 334
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2015 vs 15 August 2008
Core clock speed 557 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2048 vs 8
Floating-point performance 2x 4,833 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 2x 8 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7551 vs 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 513 vs 334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

  • 15x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 300 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7551
93
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
513
334
Name NVIDIA Tesla M60 NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark 7551 93
PassMark - G2D Mark 513 334
Geekbench - OpenCL 29243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 114.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1451.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 70.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 314.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1791

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla M60 NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Tesla
Code name GM204 G98
Launch date 30 August 2015 15 August 2008
Place in performance rating 487 485
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 557 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 4,833 gflops 22.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 2x 2048 8
Texture fill rate 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec 2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-II
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 8 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 2x 160.4 GB / s 9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0