AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1206 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33812 vs 29243
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1451.124
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 8.266
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 70.038
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 314.404
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 8663
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 vs 886
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 8663
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 vs 886
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33812 vs 29243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 vs 886 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- 15.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 137.5 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2048
- 1972.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 111.543
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1791 vs 1674
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1791 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 137.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 vs 111.543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33812 | 29243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 1791 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7551 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | GM204 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 490 | 487 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 557 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2x 4,833 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |