NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12190 vs 7915
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12190 vs 7915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 441
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 9538
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3340
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 9538
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12190 | 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 8 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 246 | 248 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 861 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 224.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |