NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12499 vs 7915
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12499 vs 7915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 434
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 9538
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3340
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 9538
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 434 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 vs 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 vs 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12499 | 7915 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 | 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 54598 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla P40 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 8 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
| Place in performance rating | 246 | 247 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 224.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla P40 with others
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIATesla P40 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
