NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1230 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 338 billion / sec
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 2x 5,046 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- 250.3x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 22732
- 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 66.419
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 7.89
- 15.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 17.882
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 309.857
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 vs 8124
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3521 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2226
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 vs 8124
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3521 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1230 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s vs 338 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops vs 2x 5,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 vs 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 vs 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 vs 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 vs 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 vs 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3521 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3521 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 5120
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 8260
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 5120 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 vs 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 | 8987 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 | 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 | 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1261.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 | 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 | 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 | 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3521 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3521 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 2226 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | Kepler |
Code name | GV100 | GK110B |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 28 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 155 | 395 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $1,580 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1230 MHz | 705 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | 2x 5,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2x 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | 338 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 672 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |