AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 5150
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1106
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1841
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1106
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1841
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 vs 5150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 vs 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 vs 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 1841 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 1677
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 5150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Oland |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1281 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |