AMD A10-7850K versus AMD A8-5600K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-7850K et AMD A8-5600K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7850K
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 33% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1498 versus 1429
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3400 versus 2855
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 516 versus 488
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1576 versus 1366
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.183 versus 4.39
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.998 versus 11.085
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.316 versus 0.213
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.104 versus 3.45
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1781 versus 807
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1947 versus 1596
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1781 versus 807
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1947 versus 1596
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 January 2014 versus 26 September 2012 |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Cache L1 | 256 KB versus 192 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1498 versus 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3400 versus 2855 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 versus 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1576 versus 1366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.183 versus 4.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.998 versus 11.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.316 versus 0.213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.104 versus 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1781 versus 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1947 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1781 versus 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1947 versus 1596 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-5600K
- 14.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.539 versus 0.799
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6089 versus 5920
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6089 versus 5920
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.539 versus 0.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6089 versus 5920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6089 versus 5920 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-7850K
CPU 2: AMD A8-5600K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-7850K | AMD A8-5600K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1498 | 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3400 | 2855 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 | 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1576 | 1366 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.183 | 4.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.998 | 11.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.316 | 0.213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.799 | 11.539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.104 | 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1781 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1947 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5920 | 6089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1781 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1947 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5920 | 6089 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-7850K | AMD A8-5600K | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaveri | Trinity |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 14 January 2014 | 26 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $173 | |
OPN PIB | AD785KXBJABOX | |
OPN Tray | AD785KXBI44JA | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1755 | 1749 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Taille de dé | 245 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | 192 KB |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
Température de noyau maximale | 72.40°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 2410 Million | 1303 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | |
Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |