AMD A10-9700 versus AMD A8-9600
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-9700 et AMD A8-9600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-9700
- Environ 12% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.8 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1619 versus 1486
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3555 versus 3298
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 493 versus 475
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1465 versus 1409
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.497 versus 3.637
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.004 versus 129.751
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.533 versus 1.041
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.928 versus 20.198
- 17.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.933 versus 5.073
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 versus 1486 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3555 versus 3298 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 versus 475 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 versus 1409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 versus 3.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 versus 129.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 versus 1.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 versus 20.198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 versus 5.073 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-9600
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 versus 1358
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 versus 2370
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 versus 7174
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 versus 1358
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 versus 2370
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 versus 7174
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 versus 1358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 versus 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 versus 7174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 versus 1358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 versus 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 versus 7174 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-9700
CPU 2: AMD A8-9600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-9700 | AMD A8-9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 | 1486 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3555 | 3298 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 475 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 | 1409 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 | 3.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 | 129.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 | 1.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 | 20.198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 | 5.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1358 | 2015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | 3006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7174 | 9707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1358 | 2015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | 3006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7174 | 9707 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-9700 | AMD A8-9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 27 July 2017 | 27 July 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $90 | $78 |
OPN PIB | AD9700AGABBOX | AD9600AGABBOX |
OPN Tray | AD9700AGM44AB | AD9600AGM44AB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 991 | 1079 |
Prix maintenant | $79.99 | $64.99 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.04 | 22.69 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | 10 |
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | 6 |
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R7 Series | Radeon R7 Series |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | 45/65 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | 8 |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Technologies élevé |
||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |