AMD A10-9700 vs AMD A8-9600
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-9700 und AMD A8-9600 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9700
- Etwa 12% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1619 vs 1486
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3555 vs 3298
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 493 vs 475
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1465 vs 1409
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.497 vs 3.637
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.004 vs 129.751
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.533 vs 1.041
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.928 vs 20.198
- 17.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.933 vs 5.073
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 vs 1486 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3555 vs 3298 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 vs 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 vs 1409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 vs 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 vs 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 vs 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 vs 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 vs 5.073 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-9600
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 vs 1358
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 vs 2370
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 vs 7174
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 vs 1358
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 vs 2370
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 vs 7174
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 vs 1358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 vs 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 vs 7174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 vs 1358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 vs 2370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 vs 7174 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-9700
CPU 2: AMD A8-9600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-9700 | AMD A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 | 1486 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3555 | 3298 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 | 1409 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 | 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 | 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 | 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 | 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 | 5.073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1358 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7174 | 9707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1358 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7174 | 9707 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-9700 | AMD A8-9600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 27 July 2017 | 27 July 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $90 | $78 |
| OPN PIB | AD9700AGABBOX | AD9600AGABBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD9700AGM44AB | AD9600AGM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 991 | 1079 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $79.99 | $64.99 |
| Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 20.04 | 22.69 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | 1178 million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | 6 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon R7 Series | Radeon R7 Series |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | 45/65 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | 8 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A10-9700 mit anderen
AMDA10-9700 vs
AMDPRO A8-9600
AMDA10-9700 vs
AMDPRO A10-8750B
AMDA10-9700 vs
IntelPentium G2140
AMDA10-9700 vs
IntelPentium Gold G6600
AMDA10-9700 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4500
AMDA10-9700 vs
IntelPentium Gold G7400T
