AMD A12-9720P versus AMD PRO A12-9800B

Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A12-9720P et AMD PRO A12-9800B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A12-9720P

versus

AMD PRO A12-9800B

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A12-9800B

CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1392 versus 1314
Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2691 versus 2656
Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 411 versus 397
Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1169 versus 1103
Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.869 versus 9.334
Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 208.601 versus 130.347
Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.302 versus 1.039
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.379 versus 17.054
Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.766 versus 44.985

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	24 October 2016 versus 1 June 2016
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark	1392 versus 1314
PassMark - CPU mark	2691 versus 2656
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	411 versus 397
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1169 versus 1103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	17.869 versus 9.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	208.601 versus 130.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.302 versus 1.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	22.379 versus 17.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	78.766 versus 44.985

Comparer les références

CPU 1: AMD A12-9720P
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800B

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1314

1392

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2656

2691

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

397

411

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1103

1169

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

9.334

17.869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

130.347

208.601

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.039

1.302

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

17.054

22.379

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

44.985

78.766

Nom	AMD A12-9720P	AMD PRO A12-9800B
PassMark - Single thread mark	1314	1392
PassMark - CPU mark	2656	2691
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	397	411
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1103	1169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.334	17.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	130.347	208.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.039	1.302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	17.054	22.379
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	44.985	78.766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6187

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD A12-9720P	AMD PRO A12-9800B
Essentiel
Nom de code de l’architecture	Bristol Ridge	Bristol Ridge
Date de sortie	1 June 2016	24 October 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1298	1270
Série	AMD Bristol Ridge	AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops
Segment vertical	Laptop	Laptop
Family		AMD PRO A-Series Processors
OPN Tray		AM980BADY44AB
OS Support		Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Performance
Soutien de 64-bit
Taille de dé	250 mm	250 mm
Cache L2	2 MB	2 MB
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Température de noyau maximale	90 °C	90°C
Fréquence maximale	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
Nombre de noyaux	4	4
Nombre de fils	4	4
Compte de transistor	3100 Million	3100 Million
Base frequency		2.7 GHz
Number of GPU cores		8
Ouvert
Compatibilité
Prise courants soutenu	FP4	FP4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Configurable TDP		12 Watt/15 Watt
Mémoire
Réseaux de mémoire maximale		2
Supported memory frequency		1866 MHz
Genres de mémoire soutenus		DDR4
Graphiques
Enduro
Freéquency maximale des graphiques		758 MHz
Compte de noyaux iGPU		8
Graphiques du processeur		R7
Graphiques changeables
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Interfaces de graphiques
DisplayPort
HDMI
Soutien des graphiques API
DirectX		12
Vulkan
Périphériques
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe		8
Révision PCI Express		3.0
Technologies élevé
AMD Secure technology
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
VirusProtect
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0