AMD A12-9720P versus AMD PRO A12-9800B

Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A12-9720P et AMD PRO A12-9800B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A12-9800B

  • CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1392 versus 1320
  • Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2691 versus 2657
  • Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 411 versus 397
  • Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1169 versus 1103
  • Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.869 versus 9.334
  • Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 208.601 versus 130.347
  • Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.302 versus 1.039
  • Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 22.379 versus 17.054
  • Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.766 versus 44.985
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 24 October 2016 versus 1 June 2016
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark 1392 versus 1320
PassMark - CPU mark 2691 versus 2657
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 411 versus 397
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1169 versus 1103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 17.869 versus 9.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 208.601 versus 130.347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.302 versus 1.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 22.379 versus 17.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 78.766 versus 44.985

Comparer les références

CPU 1: AMD A12-9720P
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800B

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1320
1392
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2657
2691
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
397
411
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1103
1169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.334
17.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
130.347
208.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.039
1.302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
17.054
22.379
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
44.985
78.766
Nom AMD A12-9720P AMD PRO A12-9800B
PassMark - Single thread mark 1320 1392
PassMark - CPU mark 2657 2691
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 397 411
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1103 1169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.334 17.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 130.347 208.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.039 1.302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.054 22.379
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 44.985 78.766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1403
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6187

Comparer les caractéristiques

AMD A12-9720P AMD PRO A12-9800B

Essentiel

Nom de code de l’architecture Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Date de sortie 1 June 2016 24 October 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1232 1206
Série AMD Bristol Ridge AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops
Segment vertical Laptop Laptop
Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors
OPN Tray AM980BADY44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit

Performance

Soutien de 64-bit
Taille de dé 250 mm 250 mm
Cache L2 2 MB 2 MB
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Température de noyau maximale 90 °C 90°C
Fréquence maximale 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Nombre de noyaux 4 4
Nombre de fils 4 4
Compte de transistor 3100 Million 3100 Million
Base frequency 2.7 GHz
Number of GPU cores 8
Ouvert

Compatibilité

Prise courants soutenu FP4 FP4
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
Configurable TDP 12 Watt/15 Watt

Mémoire

Réseaux de mémoire maximale 2
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Genres de mémoire soutenus DDR4

Graphiques

Enduro
Freéquency maximale des graphiques 758 MHz
Compte de noyaux iGPU 8
Graphiques du processeur R7
Graphiques changeables
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Interfaces de graphiques

DisplayPort
HDMI

Soutien des graphiques API

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Périphériques

Nombre maximale des voies PCIe 8
Révision PCI Express 3.0

Technologies élevé

AMD Secure technology
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0