AMD A8-7650K versus AMD A6-5400K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A8-7650K et AMD A6-5400K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-7650K
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.8 GHz versus 3.6 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1397 versus 1267
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3115 versus 1276
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 481 versus 427
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1379 versus 641
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.272 versus 0.596
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.659 versus 3.665
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.199 versus 0.122
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.107 versus 1.733
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1528 versus 603
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1528 versus 603
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 January 2014 versus October 2012 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz versus 3.6 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1397 versus 1267 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3115 versus 1276 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 481 versus 427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1379 versus 641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.272 versus 0.596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.659 versus 3.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.199 versus 0.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.107 versus 1.733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 versus 603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 versus 603 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-5400K
- 2x plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
- 19.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.9 versus 0.624
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2696 versus 1178
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4873 versus 4077
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2696 versus 1178
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4873 versus 4077
Caractéristiques | |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) versus 256 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 95 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.9 versus 0.624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2696 versus 1178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4873 versus 4077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2696 versus 1178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4873 versus 4077 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A8-7650K
CPU 2: AMD A6-5400K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A8-7650K | AMD A6-5400K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1397 | 1267 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3115 | 1276 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 481 | 427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1379 | 641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.272 | 0.596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.659 | 3.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.199 | 0.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.624 | 11.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.107 | 1.733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 | 603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1178 | 2696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4077 | 4873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 | 603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1178 | 2696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4077 | 4873 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A8-7650K | AMD A6-5400K | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaveri | Trinity |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 14 January 2014 | October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $152 | |
OPN PIB | AD765KXBJABOX | |
OPN Tray | AD765KXBI44JA | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2100 | 1799 |
Prix maintenant | $73.99 | |
Série | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Taille de dé | 245 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 72.40°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Compte de transistor | 2410 Million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 70 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | |
Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |