AMD E1-6015 versus Intel Celeron 2955U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E1-6015 et Intel Celeron 2955U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Interfaces de graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E1-6015
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB versus 512 KB |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 2955U
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 543 versus 393
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 543 versus 393
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1735 versus 985
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1735 versus 985
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2943 versus 2454
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2943 versus 2454
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.591 versus 2.146
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 543 versus 393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 543 versus 393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1735 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1735 versus 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2943 versus 2454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2943 versus 2454 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.591 versus 2.146 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E1-6015
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2955U
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E1-6015 | Intel Celeron 2955U |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 393 | 543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 393 | 543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 985 | 1735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 985 | 1735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2454 | 2943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2454 | 2943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.146 | 6.591 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 782 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 880 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 303 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 89.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.088 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E1-6015 | Intel Celeron 2955U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Beema | Haswell |
| Family | AMD E1-Series for Notebooks | |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | 1 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2255 | 2179 |
| Processor Number | E1-6015 | 2955U |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1400 MHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Taille de dé | 118 mm | |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.4 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R2 series | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA769 (FT3b) | FCBGA1168 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| IDE integré | ||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 4 | |
| Soutien de PCI | ||
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 | |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E1-6015 avec des autres
AMDE1-6015 vs
IntelCore i5-4288U
AMDE1-6015 vs
IntelCeleron 3755U
AMDE1-6015 vs
IntelPentium A1020
AMDE1-6015 vs
AppleA8
AMDE1-6015 vs
AppleA8X
