AMD PRO A10-8750B versus AMD A10-7890K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-8750B et AMD A10-7890K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-8750B
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6033 versus 3188
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6033 versus 3188
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 95 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6033 versus 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6033 versus 3188 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7890K
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 8% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.3 GHz versus 4 GHz
- Environ 2% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 72.40°C versus 71.30°C
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1589 versus 1328
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3558 versus 2950
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.344 versus 17.07
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.352 versus 221.069
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.794 versus 1.319
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.466 versus 25.369
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.183 versus 88.743
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1878 versus 1790
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1878 versus 1790
Caractéristiques | |
Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
Fréquence maximale | 4.3 GHz versus 4 GHz |
Température de noyau maximale | 72.40°C versus 71.30°C |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1589 versus 1328 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3558 versus 2950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.344 versus 17.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.352 versus 221.069 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.794 versus 1.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.466 versus 25.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.183 versus 88.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1878 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1878 versus 1790 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8750B
CPU 2: AMD A10-7890K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD PRO A10-8750B | AMD A10-7890K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1328 | 1589 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2950 | 3558 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 433 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1242 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.07 | 20.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.069 | 335.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.319 | 1.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.369 | 31.466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.743 | 106.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 | 1878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6033 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 | 1878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6033 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1319 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD PRO A10-8750B | AMD A10-7890K | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
OPN Tray | AD875BYBI44JC | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1005 | 902 |
Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaveri | |
Date de sortie | January 2016 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $150 | |
OPN PIB | AD789KXDJCHBX | |
Prix maintenant | $199.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 12 | 12 |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 72.40°C |
Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Ouvert | ||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 757 MHz | 866 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 512 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Thermal Solution | Wraith cooler | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
RAID | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 |