AMD PRO A10-9700B versus AMD Pro A8-8600B
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-9700B et AMD Pro A8-8600B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-9700B
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1294 versus 1090
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2545 versus 2190
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 October 2016 versus 3 June 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1294 versus 1090 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2545 versus 2190 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-9700B
CPU 2: AMD Pro A8-8600B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A10-9700B | AMD Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1294 | 1090 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2545 | 2190 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.061 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2559 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2559 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A10-9700B | AMD Pro A8-8600B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 24 October 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM970BADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1916 | 1911 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 758 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | |
| Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12 Watt/15 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A10-9700B avec des autres
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
AMDPhenom II X2 X620 BE
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
AMDA4-5150M
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
AMDRyzen 3 3200U
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
IntelXeon E5-2608L v4
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
IntelCeleron 2000E
AMDPRO A10-9700B vs
IntelPentium G3320TE
