AMD PRO A6-8530B versus AMD A12-9720P
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A6-8530B et AMD A12-9720P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A6-8530B
- 4.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1941 versus 397
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2807 versus 1103
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.49 versus 9.334
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 226.263 versus 130.347
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1941 versus 397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2807 versus 1103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.49 versus 9.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 226.263 versus 130.347 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A12-9720P
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.2 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1314 versus 1149
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2656 versus 1127
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.039 versus 0.903
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.054 versus 16.619
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.985 versus 43.737
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1403 versus 851
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 versus 1704
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6187 versus 4708
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1403 versus 851
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 versus 1704
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6187 versus 4708
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.2 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1314 versus 1149 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2656 versus 1127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.039 versus 0.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.054 versus 16.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.985 versus 43.737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1403 versus 851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6187 versus 4708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1403 versus 851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6187 versus 4708 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A6-8530B
CPU 2: AMD A12-9720P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A6-8530B | AMD A12-9720P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1149 | 1314 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1127 | 2656 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1941 | 397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2807 | 1103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.49 | 9.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 226.263 | 130.347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.903 | 1.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.619 | 17.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.737 | 44.985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 851 | 1403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1704 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4708 | 6187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 851 | 1403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1704 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4708 | 6187 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A6-8530B | AMD A12-9720P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | Q3 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM853BADY23AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1305 | 1298 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A6 APU for Laptops | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.3 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 6 | |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 4 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Taille de dé | 250 mm | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90 °C | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | |
| Graphiques du processeur | R5 | |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12 Watt/15 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A6-8530B avec des autres
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
AMDA8-5557M
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
AMDA12-9730P
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
IntelCore i7-5700EQ
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
IntelCore i5-7440EQ
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1606G
AMDPRO A6-8530B vs
IntelXeon E5-2628 v3
