AMD Pro A10-8700B versus AMD E2-7110
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Pro A10-8700B et AMD E2-7110 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Pro A10-8700B
- Environ 78% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.2 GHz versus 1.8 GHz
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1112 versus 610
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2198 versus 1510
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 325 versus 205
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 883 versus 664
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 versus 1.23
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.35 versus 6.252
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz versus 1.8 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1112 versus 610 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2198 versus 1510 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 versus 205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 versus 664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 versus 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 versus 6.252 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E2-7110
- 35.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 versus 2.877
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.354 versus 0.138
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 versus 3.422
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 versus 1763
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 versus 1763
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 versus 2.877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 versus 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 versus 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 versus 1763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 versus 1763 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Pro A10-8700B
CPU 2: AMD E2-7110
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD E2-7110 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1112 | 610 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2198 | 1510 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 | 664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.877 | 101.163 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 | 6.252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 | 18.962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 | 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 | 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD E2-7110 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo | Carrizo-L |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 | 7 May 2015 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2350 | 2327 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 930 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 1 |
| Fréquence mémoire prise en charge | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | DDR3L |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | |
| Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP4, FT3b |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD Pro A10-8700B avec des autres
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDTurion 64 X2 TL-64
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA4-4300M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA6-7310
