AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD E2-7110
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Pro A10-8700B und AMD E2-7110 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Pro A10-8700B
- Etwa 78% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 4.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1112 vs 610
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2198 vs 1510
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 325 vs 205
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 883 vs 664
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 vs 1.23
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.35 vs 6.252
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1112 vs 610 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2198 vs 1510 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 vs 205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 vs 664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 vs 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 vs 6.252 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD E2-7110
- 35.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 vs 2.877
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.354 vs 0.138
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 vs 3.422
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 vs 1763
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 vs 1763
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 vs 2.877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 vs 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 vs 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 vs 1763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 vs 1763 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Pro A10-8700B
CPU 2: AMD E2-7110
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD E2-7110 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1112 | 610 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2198 | 1510 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 | 664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.877 | 101.163 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 | 6.252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 | 18.962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 | 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 | 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD E2-7110 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Carrizo-L |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | 7 May 2015 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2350 | 2327 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 930 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | DDR3L |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 384 | |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 384 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP4, FT3b |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Pro A10-8700B mit anderen
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDTurion 64 X2 TL-64
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA4-4300M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA6-7310
