AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U versus AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U et AMD Ryzen 3 2300U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1788 versus 1750
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6660 versus 5529
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2503 versus 2237
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.516 versus 22.001
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.115 versus 1.94
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.83 versus 29.592
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.686 versus 90.909
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5962 versus 3348
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5962 versus 3348
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1788 versus 1750 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6660 versus 5529 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2503 versus 2237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 versus 22.001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 versus 1.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 versus 29.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 versus 90.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 724 versus 704
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 724 versus 704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.289 versus 376.268 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1788 | 1750 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6660 | 5529 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 | 724 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2503 | 2237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 | 22.001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 | 376.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 | 1.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 | 29.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 | 90.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 | 3348 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2018 | 8 January 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YM250BC4T4MFB | YM2300C4T4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 747 | 820 |
| Série | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | 6 |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FP5 | FP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U avec des autres
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon E5-2628L v3
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 7 4700U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 9 4900H
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 5 4600U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon W-11555MLE
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon W-1250E
