Intel Celeron 1017U versus Intel Pentium 2127U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron 1017U et Intel Pentium 2127U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium 2127U
- Environ 19% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 1.9 GHz versus 1.6 GHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 969 versus 815
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1064 versus 895
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 305 versus 271
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 564 versus 497
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.831 versus 2.259
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.2 versus 12.017
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.121 versus 0.1
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.662 versus 0.538
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.403 versus 0.998
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1795 versus 1520
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1795 versus 1520
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.9 GHz versus 1.6 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 969 versus 815 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1064 versus 895 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 305 versus 271 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 564 versus 497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.831 versus 2.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.2 versus 12.017 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.121 versus 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.662 versus 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.403 versus 0.998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1795 versus 1520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1795 versus 1520 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1017U
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2127U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron 1017U | Intel Pentium 2127U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 815 | 969 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 895 | 1064 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 271 | 305 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 497 | 564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.259 | 2.831 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.017 | 15.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.538 | 0.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.998 | 1.403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1520 | 1795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1520 | 1795 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron 1017U | Intel Pentium 2127U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | 1 July 2013 | 1 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3033 | 2889 |
| Processor Number | 1017U | 2127U |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $134 | |
| Prix maintenant | $134 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.00 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 94 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB | 2048 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | 31mm x 24mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1023 | FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 17 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron 1017U avec des autres
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5550
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore i7-720QM
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore i5-480M
