Intel Celeron N2830 versus Intel Celeron N2815
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron N2830 et Intel Celeron N2815 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N2830
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.41 GHz versus 2.13 GHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 626 versus 561
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 546 versus 495
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 201 versus 173
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 356 versus 305
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.616 versus 0.949
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1196 versus 1030
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1196 versus 1030
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 February 2014 versus 1 December 2013 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.41 GHz versus 2.13 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 626 versus 561 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 546 versus 495 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 201 versus 173 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 356 versus 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 versus 0.949 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1196 versus 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1196 versus 1030 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N2815
- Environ 5% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 100°C
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 28.719 versus 6.627
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.111 versus 0.092
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.568 versus 0.261
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.346 versus 0.905
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 100°C |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.719 versus 6.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 versus 0.092 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.568 versus 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.346 versus 0.905 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2830
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2815
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron N2830 | Intel Celeron N2815 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 626 | 561 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 546 | 495 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 201 | 173 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 356 | 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 | 0.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.627 | 28.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 | 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 1.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.905 | 1.346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1196 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1196 | 1030 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron N2830 | Intel Celeron N2815 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Bay Trail | Bay Trail |
| Date de sortie | 23 February 2014 | 1 December 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3190 | 3178 |
| Processor Number | N2830 | N2815 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.16 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 112 KB | 112 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.41 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.40V – 1.14V | 0.40V – 1.14V |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3L 1066 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | 313 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 750 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 2 | 2 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | 4.5 W |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 5 | 5 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | 2 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron N2830 avec des autres
IntelCeleron N2830 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300
IntelCeleron N2830 vs
IntelCore i3-350M
IntelCeleron N2830 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
