Intel Celeron N3060 versus Intel Core M-5Y10
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron N3060 et Intel Core M-5Y10 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N3060
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.48 GHz versus 2.00 GHz
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 69.165 versus 22.916
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.449 versus 0.262
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.417 versus 1.424
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2015 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.48 GHz versus 2.00 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 512 KB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 69.165 versus 22.916 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 versus 0.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 versus 1.424 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core M-5Y10
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 6% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 95 °C versus 90°C
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.5 Watt versus 6 Watt
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 976 versus 629
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1644 versus 663
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.013 versus 4.598
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.696 versus 9.107
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 844 versus 498
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1554 versus 1431
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2526 versus 2267
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 844 versus 498
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1554 versus 1431
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2526 versus 2267
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95 °C versus 90°C |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt versus 6 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 976 versus 629 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1644 versus 663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.013 versus 4.598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.696 versus 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 844 versus 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 versus 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 versus 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 844 versus 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 versus 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 versus 2267 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3060
CPU 2: Intel Core M-5Y10
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Core M-5Y10 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 629 | 976 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 663 | 1644 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 | 5.013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 69.165 | 22.916 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 | 0.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 | 1.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 12.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 498 | 844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 | 2526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 498 | 844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 | 2526 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 970 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Core M-5Y10 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Braswell | Broadwell |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2300 | 2310 |
| Processor Number | N3060 | 5Y10 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 800 MHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 95 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.48 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 82 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | |
| Compte de transistor | 1300 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1600 | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
Graphiques |
||
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 |
| Device ID | 0x161E | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 30mm x 16.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1170 | BGA |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 4 | 12 |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 5 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron N3060 avec des autres
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3100
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore M-5Y10
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore i7-2610UE
