Intel Core i3-4170 versus AMD A10-5800K
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i3-4170 et AMD A10-5800K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-4170
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 85% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 54 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2052 versus 1492
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3596 versus 2954
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 823 versus 523
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1743 versus 1469
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 46.136 versus 9.891
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.297 versus 0.206
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.273 versus 0.594
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2052 versus 1492 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3596 versus 2954 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 823 versus 523 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1743 versus 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.136 versus 9.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 versus 0.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.273 versus 0.594 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-5800K
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.37 versus 2.614
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.484 versus 3.137
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1020 versus 870
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2453 versus 2169
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5148 versus 3711
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1020 versus 870
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2453 versus 2169
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5148 versus 3711
| Caractéristiques | |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.37 versus 2.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.484 versus 3.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1020 versus 870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 versus 2169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1020 versus 870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 versus 2169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 versus 3711 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-4170
CPU 2: AMD A10-5800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i3-4170 | AMD A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2052 | 1492 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3596 | 2954 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 823 | 523 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1743 | 1469 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.614 | 4.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.136 | 9.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 | 0.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.273 | 0.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.137 | 3.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 870 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2169 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3711 | 5148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 870 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2169 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3711 | 5148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i3-4170 | AMD A10-5800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Trinity |
| Date de sortie | Q1'15 | 26 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1940 | 1887 |
| Processor Number | i3-4170 | |
| Série | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $122 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.70 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 4096 KB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x41E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | Up to 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i3-4170 avec des autres
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 400e
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCore i5-3450S
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDA8-5500
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCeleron G4900
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
AMDA8-6500T
IntelCore i3-4170 vs
IntelCore i3-3245
