Intel Core i5-5675C versus AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-5675C et AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-5675C
- Environ 80% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.60 GHz versus 2 GHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2211 versus 1916
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3147 versus 1632
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 versus 1514
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3325
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3147 versus 1632
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 versus 1514
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz versus 2 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 versus 1916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 versus 1632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 versus 1632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6719 versus 5714
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6719 versus 5714 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2211 | 1916 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5714 | 6719 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | 1632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | 1632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3325 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-5675C | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | Zen |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1275 | 1289 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Taille de dé | 210 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Compte de transistor | 4950 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-5675C avec des autres
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i3-8300T
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDAthlon 3000G
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelPentium Gold G5600T
