Intel Core i5-7400 versus Intel Core i5-3550
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-7400 et Intel Core i5-3550 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-7400
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 67.4°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 77 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2078 versus 1986
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5477 versus 4794
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 881 versus 767
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2786 versus 2526
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.523 versus 3.362
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 74.155 versus 9.39
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 versus 0.404
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.919
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.905 versus 5.067
- 8.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5712 versus 680
- 8.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5712 versus 680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | January 2017 versus 23 April 2012 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 67.4°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 77 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2078 versus 1986 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5477 versus 4794 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 881 versus 767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2786 versus 2526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.523 versus 3.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.155 versus 9.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 versus 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.905 versus 5.067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5712 versus 680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5712 versus 680 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-3550
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.70 GHz versus 3.50 GHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2778 versus 2078
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.70 GHz versus 3.50 GHz |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2778 versus 2078 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-7400
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3550
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-7400 | Intel Core i5-3550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2078 | 1986 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5477 | 4794 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 881 | 767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2786 | 2526 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2078 | 2778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.523 | 3.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.155 | 9.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.201 | 1.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.905 | 5.067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5712 | 680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5712 | 680 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-7400 | Intel Core i5-3550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaby Lake | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | January 2017 | 23 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $202 | $205 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1394 | 2506 |
| Prix maintenant | $208.31 | $329.95 |
| Processor Number | i5-7400 | i5-3550 |
| Série | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.39 | 6.19 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 67 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 67.4°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.50 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 160 mm | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 1333/1600 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x5912 | 0x152 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | 2011D |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-7400 avec des autres
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i3-2100T
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i3-4360T
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDA10-7870K
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
IntelCore i7-6700
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDA6-9500E
IntelCore i5-7400 vs
AMDRyzen 3 2300X
