Intel Core i5-8400 versus Intel Core i7-7700
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-8400 et Intel Core i7-7700 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-8400
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 6 versus 4
- Environ 13% plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 64 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 9238 versus 8648
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4580 versus 4044
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 3633 versus 3043
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.752 versus 0.743
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.767 versus 3.004
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.333 versus 7.298
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 6 versus 4 |
| Cache L3 | 9 MB versus 8 MB |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 64 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9238 versus 8648 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4580 versus 4044 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3633 versus 3043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.752 versus 0.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.767 versus 3.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.333 versus 7.298 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-7700
- 2 plus de fils: 8 versus 6
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.20 GHz versus 4.00 GHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2454 versus 2382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1059 versus 1048
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.912 versus 5.68
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 93.066 versus 73.097
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1967 versus 1826
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6644 versus 6201
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1967 versus 1826
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6644 versus 6201
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 6 |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.20 GHz versus 4.00 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2454 versus 2382 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1059 versus 1048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.912 versus 5.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.066 versus 73.097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1967 versus 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3914 versus 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6644 versus 6201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1967 versus 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3914 versus 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6644 versus 6201 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8400
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-7700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-8400 | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2382 | 2454 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9238 | 8648 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1048 | 1059 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4580 | 4044 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3633 | 3043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.68 | 5.912 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 73.097 | 93.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.752 | 0.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.767 | 3.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.333 | 7.298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1826 | 1967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3900 | 3914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6201 | 6644 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1826 | 1967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3900 | 3914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6201 | 6644 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-8400 | Intel Core i7-7700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $190 | $303 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1144 | 1126 |
| Prix maintenant | $259 | $309.99 |
| Processor Number | i5-8400 | i7-7700 |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.28 | 10.22 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Cache L3 | 9 MB | 8 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.00 GHz | 4.20 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 6 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 6 | 8 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E92 | 0x5912 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 630 |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-8400 avec des autres
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelCore i7-7800X
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelCore i5-9400T
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400GE
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDRyzen 7 3800X
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelCore i3-10105F
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R2544
