Intel Pentium 4425Y versus Intel Core i7-4712MQ
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium 4425Y et Intel Core i7-4712MQ pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium 4425Y
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 6.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 37 Watt
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 130.749 versus 68.752
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.828 versus 0.37
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.099 versus 3.147
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.23 versus 11.044
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1200 versus 1180
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3977 versus 3354
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1200 versus 1180
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3977 versus 3354
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 37 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 130.749 versus 68.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.828 versus 0.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.099 versus 3.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.23 versus 11.044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1200 versus 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3977 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1200 versus 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3977 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1806 versus 952
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5340 versus 1694
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.209 versus 11.633
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3489 versus 2108
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3489 versus 2108
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1806 versus 952 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5340 versus 1694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.209 versus 11.633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3489 versus 2108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3489 versus 2108 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 4425Y
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4712MQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium 4425Y | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 952 | 1806 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1694 | 5340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.633 | 12.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 130.749 | 68.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.828 | 0.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.099 | 3.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.23 | 11.044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1200 | 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2108 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3977 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1200 | 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2108 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3977 | 3354 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 738 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2636 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium 4425Y | Intel Core i7-4712MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaby Lake | Haswell |
| Date de sortie | Q1'19 | 14 April 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1521 | 1512 |
| Numéro du processeur | 4425Y | i7-4712MQ |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Processor 4000 Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Statut | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $378 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 1.70 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s QPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 8 |
| Taille de dé | 177 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | |
| Cache L3 | 6 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 100 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.30 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 29.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x591E | 0x416 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Dimensions du boîtier | 20mm X 16.5mm | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1515 | FCPGA946 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Éligibilité à la plateforme Intel® vPro™ | ||
| Technologie Speed Shift | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium 4425Y avec des autres
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCore i3-4000M
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCore i5-6260U
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCeleron 3965U
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDRX-427BB
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050U
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
