Intel Pentium G2030 versus Intel Celeron J1900
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium G2030 et Intel Celeron J1900 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium G2030
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1610 versus 652
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1759 versus 1151
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 548 versus 210
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 968 versus 686
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.876 versus 11.336
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.195 versus 0.139
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.897 versus 0.508
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.318 versus 1.753
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1841 versus 1007
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1841 versus 1007
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1610 versus 652 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1759 versus 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 548 versus 210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 968 versus 686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.876 versus 11.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.195 versus 0.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.897 versus 0.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.318 versus 1.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1841 versus 1007 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1841 versus 1007 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 versus 1.236
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 versus 1.236 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G2030
CPU 2: Intel Celeron J1900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium G2030 | Intel Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1610 | 652 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1759 | 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 548 | 210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 968 | 686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.236 | 3.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.876 | 11.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.195 | 0.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.897 | 0.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.318 | 1.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1841 | 1007 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1841 | 1007 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium G2030 | Intel Celeron J1900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Bay Trail |
| Date de sortie | Q2'13 | 1 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2625 | 3166 |
| Processor Number | G2030 | J1900 |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $82 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Cache L1 | 224 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.42 GHz | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 21 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3L 1333 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 688 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 854 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 854 MHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 2 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 25mm X 27mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1155 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | X4, X2, X1 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 4 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium G2030 avec des autres
IntelPentium G2030 vs
AMDAthlon X2 4050e
IntelPentium G2030 vs
AMDPhenom II X3 710
IntelPentium G2030 vs
IntelPentium E5500
IntelPentium G2030 vs
IntelCore i5-2400
IntelPentium G2030 vs
IntelCore i3-2105
IntelPentium G2030 vs
AMDA4-3420
