Intel Pentium G3260 versus Intel Celeron G3900
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium G3260 et Intel Celeron G3900 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium G3260
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1867 versus 1717
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 696 versus 678
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1275 versus 1244
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 36.364 versus 34.175
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.104 versus 7.573
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1867 versus 1717 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 696 versus 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1275 versus 1244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 36.364 versus 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.104 versus 7.573 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G3900
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 4% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 53 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2186 versus 2088
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.745 versus 5.488
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.264 versus 0.224
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 861 versus 656
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1554 versus 1378
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2853 versus 2481
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 861 versus 656
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1554 versus 1378
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2853 versus 2481
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt versus 53 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2186 versus 2088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 versus 5.488 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 versus 0.224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 versus 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 versus 1378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 versus 2481 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 versus 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 versus 1378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 versus 2481 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3260
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium G3260 | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1867 | 1717 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2088 | 2186 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 696 | 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1275 | 1244 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1318 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.488 | 7.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 36.364 | 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.224 | 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.104 | 7.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 656 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1378 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2481 | 2853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 656 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1378 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2481 | 2853 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium G3260 | Intel Celeron G3900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Skylake |
| Date de sortie | Q1'15 | September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2119 | 2122 |
| Processor Number | G3260 | G3900 |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $50 | |
| Prix maintenant | $52.62 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.63 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de dé | 150 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.8 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 21.3 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 1.7 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 |
| Device ID | 0x1902 | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 950 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | N / A |
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium G3260 avec des autres
IntelPentium G3260 vs
AMDPhenom X4 9150e
IntelPentium G3260 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelPentium G3260 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelPentium G3260 vs
IntelCore i5-6600T
IntelPentium G3260 vs
IntelCeleron G3900
IntelPentium G3260 vs
IntelPentium G3240
