Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 versus Intel Core i7-3770
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 et Intel Core i7-3770 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 32.77 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2125 versus 2074
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6638 versus 6416
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 821 versus 798
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | May 2012 versus April 2012 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32.77 GB versus 32 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2125 versus 2074 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6638 versus 6416 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 821 versus 798 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3076 versus 3074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.685 versus 4.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.319 versus 2.318 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-3770
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 81.095 versus 15.885
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.589 versus 0.56
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.05 versus 5.602
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2876 versus 2590
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2876 versus 2590
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 81.095 versus 15.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.589 versus 0.56 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.05 versus 5.602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2876 versus 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2876 versus 2590 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3770
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2125 | 2074 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6638 | 6416 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 821 | 798 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3076 | 3074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.685 | 4.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.885 | 81.095 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.56 | 0.589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.319 | 2.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.602 | 6.05 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2590 | 2876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2590 | 2876 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1977 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | May 2012 | April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $808 | $324 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2095 | 2019 |
| Prix maintenant | $394.72 | $159.99 |
| Processor Number | E3-1275V2 | i7-3770 |
| Série | Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v2 Family | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.05 | 17.10 |
| Segment vertical | Server | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8192 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.90 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 8 |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | 1400 million |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 67 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32.77 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.25 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.25 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| Device ID | 0x162 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 77 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 & 1x4, 2x8 & 1x4 or 1x8 & 3x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 avec des autres
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
IntelXeon E5-2680
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
IntelXeon E5-1620
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
AMDOpteron 6284 SE
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
IntelXeon E3-1230 v3
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
AMDOpteron X2170
IntelXeon E3-1275 v2 vs
AMDOpteron 1389
