AMD Radeon Pro 555X versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 555X and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 3x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 256
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5100 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12707 versus 3053
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 versus 19.856
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 versus 309.824
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 versus 1.38
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 versus 25.011
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 versus 84.489
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 versus 2709
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3328
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 versus 2709
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3328
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 7 February 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 versus 256 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12707 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 versus 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 versus 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 versus 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 versus 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 versus 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 907 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 versus 2350
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 versus 2350
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 907 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 versus 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 versus 2350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12707 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3328 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1644 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 999 | 1000 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1252 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5100 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s |