AMD Radeon R7 M340 versus NVIDIA GeForce 710M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M340 and NVIDIA GeForce 710M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M340
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 943 MHz versus 719 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1021 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.16 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 320 versus 96
- Environ 85% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 549.1 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 655 versus 459
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 versus 125
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5182 versus 2445
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.48 versus 6.51
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 164.511 versus 148.156
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.943 versus 0.577
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 versus 11.718
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 versus 19.855
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 versus 1030
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 versus 1030
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 24 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz versus 719 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 versus 459 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 versus 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5182 versus 2445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 versus 6.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 164.511 versus 148.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 versus 0.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 versus 11.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 versus 19.855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 versus 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 versus 1030 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 1732
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 1668
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 1732
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 1668
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 1732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce 710M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 655 | 459 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5182 | 2445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 | 6.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 164.511 | 148.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 | 0.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 | 11.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 | 19.855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Meso | GK208 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 24 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1396 | 1399 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1021 MHz | 800 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 943 MHz | 719 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 549.1 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.16 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |