NVIDIA GRID M40 versus NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID M40 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID M40
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 930 MHz versus 810 MHz
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 versus 7.765
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 576.664 versus 161.305
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.529 versus 14.257
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.629 versus 22.768
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 21 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 versus 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 versus 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 versus 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 versus 22.768 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 | 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 | 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 | 22.768 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 495 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GRID M40 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1473 | 1475 |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | 810 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 1802 MHz |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |